Commentary
Baku may allow radical nationalists to publicly discuss “reunification” with Azeri Iranians, but the president and key officials prefer not to comment publicly on the protests in Iran.
Bashir Kitachaev
{
"authors": [
"Zaha Hassan"
],
"type": "commentary",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [
"Rebuilding Gaza: The Human Dimension",
"Palestine/Israel Projects"
],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [
"Middle East"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Palestine",
"Middle East"
],
"topics": []
}
Bureij, central Gaza Strip, on January 23. (Photo by Eyad Baba/AFP via Getty Images)
Commentary
What the Gaza Ceasefire Means
The deal is extremely fragile, but there’s some reason for hope.
By Zaha Hassan
Published on Jan 24, 2025
After more than fifteen months, Israeli military operations inside Gaza have largely abated, as has the constant hum from surveillance drones and quadcopters. The three-phrase ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas—negotiated by Qatar, Egypt, and the United States in May 2024 and enshrined in a UN Security Council resolution one month later—was finally pushed over the finish line just ahead of the inauguration of U.S. President Donald Trump.
The deal is extremely fragile—and long overdue and much too late for some held captive in Gaza and the tens of thousands of Palestinians who have been killed or severely wounded. Phase one allows six weeks of quiet, the withdrawal of Israeli troops from Palestinian population centers, a surge in humanitarian relief and supplies, and a return of the displaced to what is left of their homes. Each week, certain categories of Israeli captives will be exchanged for Palestinian prisoners and detainees held without charge. By the sixteenth day, negotiations will begin over the terms for a second phase that could include Israeli troops moving out of Gaza and a permanent ceasefire taking hold. In the third phase, Gaza’s reconstruction and rehabilitation would begin.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has stated that Israel is only committed to a temporary ceasefire. But the Trump administration’s Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff, has said he prefers diplomacy over war and has indicated the wish for negotiations to continue with Hamas.
Achieving a diplomatic solution will require sustained U.S. and international engagement to encourage both Israel and Hamas to fully implement their commitments. Much hinges on a successful phase one—and the volatile dynamics in Netanyahu’s governing coalition—to support negotiations leading to phase two. Will restrictions on the entry of goods and aid workers to Gaza be permitted? Will adequate humanitarian relief be distributed throughout Gaza? Will healthcare be accessible for the injured and infirm? And will foreign passport holders, students, and patients needing specialized care in the West Bank and abroad be able to travel?
There is some reason to be hopeful. In the first three days of the ceasefire, 2,400 aid trucks entered Gaza, up from a daily average of fifty-one earlier in the month. Palestinian police are again providing security for the humanitarian relief efforts, including the safe entry and distribution of food, water, and essential supplies. But more than aid and calm are needed to move Gaza into the next phases.
In this series, experts on humanitarian relief and healthcare delivery in conflict zones and postconflict environments share their insights on the challenges ahead for Gaza and offer recommendations for early stabilization efforts toward rebuilding communities:
- The Immediate Priorities for Rebuilding Gaza’s Health System
- Restoring Palestinians’ Access to and From Gaza Should Be a Ceasefire Priority
- Inside Gaza’s Hospitals: The Crisis and Lack of Medical Supplies
- To Look Toward Recovery, Gaza First Needs a Surge in Humanitarian Aid
- What Gaza’s Children Need During the Ceasefire
- What’s Next for Gaza?
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- Baku Proceeds With Caution as Ethnic Azeris Join Protests in Neighboring Iran
- There’s Never Been a President Like Trump on IsraelCommentary
Trump’s unmatched leverage over Netanyahu gives the prime minister little room to maneuver.
Aaron David Miller, Daniel C. Kurtzer
- Iran’s Protests Are Following a Familiar PatternCommentary
This time, though, they’re adding even more pressure to an already beleaguered regime.
Eric Lob
- What Russia Will—and Won’t—Do for Its Embattled Ally IranCommentary
It’s one thing to export Russian helicopters to Iran to fight the insurgency, and it’s easy to imagine Moscow becoming a haven for fleeing Iranian leaders. But it’s very difficult to imagine Russian troops defending the Iranian regime on the ground.
Nikita Smagin
- A House Divided: How Internal Power Struggles Shape Iraq’s Foreign PolicyCommentary
Iraq’s foreign policy is being shaped by its own internal battles—fractured elites, competing militias, and a state struggling to speak with one voice. The article asks: How do these divisions affect Iraq’s ability to balance between the U.S. and Iran? Can Baghdad use its “good neighbor” approach to reduce regional tensions? And what will it take for Iraq to turn regional investments into real stability at home? It explores potential solutions, including strengthening state institutions, curbing rogue militias, improving governance, and using regional partnerships to address core economic and security weaknesses so Iraq can finally build a unified and sustainable foreign policy.
Mike Fleet
